Tuesday, October 15, 2013

WHAT IF REPUBLICANS WERE ABLE TO REPEAL THE ACA


The original reason why Congressional Republicans managed to shut-down the government was because the President and the Democrats would not agree to de-fund or at least change Obamacare (more properly known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, or the ACA). In other words, the Republicans hate health care reform so much that they are willing to do great harm to all Americans for purely political reasons. You would think that healthcare reform was such a horrible law that the Republicans are justified in this blackmail, but the truth is that Obamacare is a very good law that reforms medical care in America and benefits everybody.
            It might be said that the opposition to the ACA has been fueled and funded by the health insurance industry, or that well-heeled Republicans object to the higher taxes the law imposes on wealthy taxpayers. But that would not explain the widespread fervor of grass-root right-wing Republicans against the law. I suspect that Republican hostility to the ACA is rooted in class conflict. Republicans despise poor people, even the working poor, and deeply resent the fact that the ACA will make it possible for over 30 million people who previously were unable to afford health insurance to now get coverage. Many people fail to realize, however, that the ACA will benefit all Americans, not just the poor. Here’s what would happen if it were repealed.
1. Repeal of the ACA would mean that senior citizens would be denied relief from the “doughnut hole.” Senior citizens who are beneficiaries of the Medicare Part D drug program should be aware that the ACA has already begun to close the “doughnut hole.” That is the period during which seniors have to pay the full cost of their prescriptions. After seniors amass $2,970 in drug costs, Medicare stops paying for drug expenses. That period lasts until seniors reach $4,750 in prescription costs--a figure most seniors never reach in one year. Obamacare will eventually abolish the doughnut hole and continue to pay for most drug costs no matter how high they go. For many seniors who simply cannot afford to buy their essential medications during the doughnut hole, that will be life-saving. If the law is repealed, the doughnut hole will not be eliminated.
2. Repeal of the ACA would add to $230 billion to the deficit. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate, the ACA reduces the deficit by $230 billion over the next decade. This is because the law not only provides for government financial support of many reforms but also provides for higher taxes on wealthy taxpayers in order to pay for the reforms. The taxes exceed the amount needed to finance the law by $230 billion.
3. The ACA creates an online Insurance Exchange that will enable purchasers to search for the best and lowest-cost insurance. Repeal would mean no exchange. The Exchange will offer low-cost insurance to uninsured people. Many people will be able to get coverage for $50 per month or less.
4. Repealing the ACA would mean higher health insurance premiums. The amount people actually pay for premiums would be much higher after repeal because most people will be able to get a subsidy from the government to help pay for the cost of health insurance. People who currently have insurance and are struggling to pay the premiums will be able to purchase health insurance on one of the exchanges created by the law. The rates they will have to pay on the exchanges will be dramatically lower than the rates they have to pay now. 
      5. Repeal would eliminate the provisions of the bill that offer tax credits to about 4 million small-business men and women to help them cover the cost of insurance for their employees.
6. Repeal would mean that insurance companies would be able to go back to denying health insurance because of preexisting conditions, annual caps, or lifetime caps on health insurance coverage.  Without the protection of the ACA, insurance companies would be able to go on rescinding patients’ policies when the patients file claims for benefits.
            7.  The ACA creates a long-term-care insurance program, financed by voluntary payroll deductions, to provide benefits to adults who become functionally disabled. Repeal would remove that program.
8. The ACA requires that health plans allow young people up to age 26 to remain on their parents’ insurance policies if their parents so choose. Repeal would mean no such coverage for young people.
9. The ACA eliminates co-payments for preventative services and exempts preventative services from deductibles under the Medicare program. Repeal would mean return of such co-payments and deductibles. There are many other provisions of the ACA that will benefit everybody.
The real reason Tea Party leaders in Congress oppose the law is that they are afraid that it will succeed and that the American people will come to like it. They think that it is part of a creeping socialism in this country that they want to halt. If they could have their way, they would abolish Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid as well.

Republicans argue that half of all Americans oppose the ACA, but that is really a misleading statement. According to a recent CNN/ORC International survey, only 38% really oppose the law.  Although 57% of Americans say they oppose the law, 11% say they oppose the measure because it isn't liberal enough. Add that 11% to the 38% who say they favor the law and that means that about half the public, 49%, either support the law or don't think it goes far enough. Compare that to the 38% who are the ones who actually oppose the law.